Showing posts with label Divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Divorce. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Alice Cook vs. James M. Cook, Bartow County, Georgia, Divorce Final, 1879

Alice Cook vs. James M. Cook, Bartow County, Georgia, Divorce, 1879

[Research Note from External Sources]: Alice Franklin, daughter of Augustus Montgomery Frankin, married James M. Cook in Bartow County, Georgia, in 1874. In the 1880 US Census, Alice Cook, divorced, lives in her father's household in Cartersville. 

Alice Cook vs. James M. Cook, The Cartersville Express

25 July 1879, page 3

[Quote]: 

"Alice Cook vs. Jas. M. Cook, libel for divorce; plaintiff divorced."

[Source]: 

Alice Cook (untitled item) in "Doings of Bartow Superior Court," The Cartersville Express (Cartersville, Bartow, Georgia) 1875-18??, Friday, 25 July 1879, page 8 (digital image 8), Georgia Historic Newspapers, Digital Library of Georgia (GALILEO). https://gahistoricnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu/lccn/sn85027043/1879-07-25/ed-1/seq-8/print/image_532x817_from_1624,7279_to_2746,8999/ (accessed 10 November 2020 by D.K. Pritchett). 

Alice Cook vs. James M. Cook, Libel for Divorce, Bartow County, Georgia, 1879

Quote from The Free Press 
Cartersville, Bartow County, Georgia

16 January 1879, page 3

"Alice Cook vs. James M. Cook. Libel for divorce. Divorce allowed." 

[Research Reference, external source: James M. Cook married Alice A. Franklin (daughter of Augustus Montgomery Franklin) in 1874 in Bartow County, Georgia. In the 1880 US census, Alice Cook, divorced, is loving in the household of her father, A. M. Franklin, in Bartow County, Georgia. The first known mention of divorce appeared in a Cartersville paper in 1877, and was apparently a suit (or a legal point in the divorce) initiated by the husband, but denied--that is, the verdict went in favor of the wife. However, in this current item, the wife is the plaintiff and the verdict is "allowed."]

[Source]: 

Alice Cook (untitled, libel for divorce) in "Bartow Superior Court," The Free Press (Cartersville, Bartow, Georgia) 1878-1883, Thursday, 16 January 1879, page 3 (digital image 3), Georgia Historic Newspapers, Digital Library of Georgia (GALILEO). https://gahistoricnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu/lccn/sn88061099/1879-01-16/ed-1/seq-3/print/image_617x817_from_1382,3978_to_2466,5413/ (accessed 10 November 2020 by D.K. Pritchett). 



James M. Cook vs. Alice Cook, Libel for Divorce, Bartow County, Georgia, 1877

James M. Cook vs. Alice Cook, Libel for Divorce, 1877

Bartow County, Georgia

Research Note: Alice Cook's maiden name is Alice Franklin. She was the daughter of Augustus Montgomery Franklin, a long-time sheriff of Bartow County, Georgia. Alice married James M. Cook in 1874 in Bartow County, Georgia. 

Three items found in newspapers in Cartersville, Georgia, show that James M. and Alice Cook divorced. The first known item appeared in The Cartersville Express in 1877: James M. Cook vs. Alice Cook, Libel for Divorce. 

This item indicates that divorce proceedings were initiated by the husband--or at least, that this particular instance in the Superior court proceedings was initiated by him. Here, the finding is in favor of Alice. Perhaps this means that she objected to the divorce and it was not granted, for in 1879, at least two more items are found, in which Alice is the plaintiff. In those items, the divorce suit is granted, and then performed or finalized. 

Possibly, there are other related items in the papers. The search process is slow and difficult, so items may have been missed.

Here is the 1877 notice:

[Quote from The Cartersville Express, 02 August 1877, page 3]: 

"James M. Cook vs. Alice Cook. Libel for divorce. Verdict for Defendant."

[Source]: 

James M. Cook and Alice Cook (untitled, libel for divorce) in "Bartow Superior Court," The Cartersville Express (Cartersville, Bartow, Georgia) 1875-18??, Thurs. morn., 02 August 1877, page 3 (digital image 3), Georgia Historic Newspapers, Digital Library of Georgia (GALILEO). https://gahistoricnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu/lccn/sn85027043/1877-08-02/ed-1/seq-3/print/image_627x817_from_1271,2839_to_2243,4105/ (accessed 10 November 2020 by D.K. Pritchett). 


Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Divorce Petition: Rachel Prince Against William Prince, Lawrence County, Kentucky, 1835

[Extract by another family researcher, now unknown; presented "as is"; please verify by checking court records in Lawence County, Kentucky, if possible.]
_______________________________________________

Notes: Divorce Petition, Dec. 21, 1835
Lawrence County (?) Circuit Court
Rachel Prince vs. William Prince

     To the honorable Judge of the Lawrence circuit court in chancery now sitting your oratrix Rachel Prince humbly complaining unto your honor that about twenty-five years ago she inter-married with one William Prince her present husband, in the county of Russell, state of Virginia. That they resided many years after their marriage in said county and state and finally about seven or eight years ago they removed to this state and settled in the county of Lawrence. That ever since her marriage with the said Wm. Prince who she prays may be made a defendant to this bill she has conducted herself toward him as a prudent, dutiful and affectionate wife should do until the defendant by his abusive and cruel conduct towards her made it necessary for her to protect herself and then she only resisted his ill-natured command and abuse so far as was necessary to her safety and protection.

     That about six or seven years ago he finally abandoned your oratrix and took up with one Arty Mullens with whom he lives in open acts of adultery and by whom he had two children. She would further represent that the defendant has left her she has purchased and procured about one hundred and twenty-five acres of land and cleared about fifteen acres upon which she settled with eight children and so soon as she was enabled to live from from want and by her and her children's industry able to support themselves the defendant came upon the land with his said woman and built a house thereon and in which he openly lives with said woman as his wife within three hundred yards of the house of your oratrix. That he has assumed authority over and taken possession of your oratrix's farm and stock which stock amounted to about twenty head of hogs, and three head of cattle, and appropriates them to his own and his woman's use. He has also taken from her her only earthly comfort and support in her old age and adversity (her children) and has taken them to the house in which he and his woman lives and placed them under her tuition and (?) (?). He has also advertised to the world not to trade with or credit your oratrix on any account thereby cutting her out of all means of support but the protecting arm of your honorable court and  the law.

     She charges that the title to said land is in the commonwealth your oratrix having the land under treasury warrants of the State of Kentucky and that the defendant has been endeavoring to get the patents issued in his name. The the patents are by contracts of your oratrix to issue in the names James and John Prince the sons of your oratrix and who lived with and assisted your oratrix until the defendant forced them from her. That patent for one hundred acres is to issue to said James Prince and twenty-five to said John Prince the sons of your oratrix.

     All which outings and doing are contrary to equity and the statute in such case made and provided tends to the impoverishment of your oratrix. She prays therefore that your honor would deem that she be divorced from her said husband, Wm. Prince, and that all persons be restrained from issuing a patent to said Wm. Prince or to any person or persons but the above named James and John Prince her said sons and that the said Wm. Prince be restrained and enjoined from any further control of the said farm and stock and from any further interference with your oratrix until the matter and things can be heard by your honor in your honorable court.  And then upon due proof of the several allegations in this bill desire that the said farm be and the said stock be at the disposal of your oratrix for her alimony and maintenance and her children's maintenance and education and desire that the patents issued as above stated.

    Prays that defendant make true and perfect answers to this bill grant (?) (?) and such other and further relief as to equity belongs. Your oratrix in duty bound will ever pray.

Rachel appeared and made an oath to a Justice of the Peace that the matter and things set forth in the bill were true, by her own knowledge. Signed by Walter Osborn, JPLC, Dec. 26, 1835.

January 1836:
William Prince was summoned to appear in court to answer the petition.

April 1836: The case was executed and continued through October 1837 with no evidence that a divorce be granted.
____________________________

Related:
William Prince and Arty (Mullins) Prince in 1850 Census, Georgia
https://northgeorgiakin.blogspot.com/2017/11/william-and-arty-prince-in-census-1850.html